The book no one can read: Why can't anyone decipher this mysterious manuscript?

Inside the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University is the Voynich manuscript: a book that has come to be known as “the world’s most mysterious manuscript.” Since a team of scientists has recently determined the age of  the Voynich (pronounced Voy-nitch) manuscript, we relish the opportunity to discuss this enigma as well as some wonderful words around cryptography and linguistics.

Consisting of 240 pages of detailed illustrations and a cipher (a method of secret writing using substitution or transposition of letters according to a key), the book has a unique and notorious quality. For decades, historians and scientists have studied its ancient pages but have been unable to decipher its text.  Who wrote this manuscript and why? Is there a hidden message within the pages of this document?

A book dealer named Wilfrid M. Voynich discovered the manuscript outside of Rome in 1912, and it has been in the news because of the work of scientists at the University of Arizona. Using a technique called radiocarbon dating, the team of researchers concluded that the book was probably composed between 1404 and 1438 – earlier than previously thought. The detailed illustrations of specific dress, hairstyles and landscapes as well as the “letter-based cipher” theory help to identify the region of origin as European. The manuscript is written on vellum (animal skin); this enabled scientists to accurately date the manuscript.

The text within the manuscript consists of over 170,000 glyphs, some resembling Latin text. These pictographs or characters, written with one or two simple pen strokes, outline six sections: Herbal, Astronomical, Biological, Cosmological, Pharmaceutical and Recipes. Each section contains an illustration depicting the subject and within each section there seems to be an alphabet consisting of 20-30 distinct glyphs that repeat. However, there are about twenty-four isolated characters that occur only once or twice throughout the manuscript.

Many scientists and historians believe that the manuscript was meant to act as a pharmacopoeia – a handbook for early modern medicine. If this is true, perhaps once accurately deciphered, the manuscript will help navigate scientists toward uncharted medical territory.

Some theorize the text is idioglossia, a private language that only one or two people could ever decipher. The oddness of the characters suggests at the very least an argot, “a specialized idiomatic vocabulary peculiar to a particular class or group of people, devised for private communication.”

And who wrote the manuscript? Some theorists believe Voynich himself was the author. If that is the case, the manuscript is not only one of the greatest cons in literary history but a work of linguistic genius in its own right. Any theories of your own? Share them below.

-Groupon faces big sector competition in France

Internet Business News November 28, 2011

Internet Business News 11-28-2011 -Groupon faces big sector competition in France

28 November 2011 – Collective shopping website Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN), with a market share of 90% in France, is now facing growing competition as almost 70 market players already offer similar services in the country. in our site groupon san diego

The collective shopping market in France is seen to hit sales of EUR330m (USD442m) this year, of which EUR300m for Groupon.

Groupon recorded 8.1m unique visits in October, according to audience measurement company Mediametrie. go to web site groupon san diego

It is followed by Lookingo and KGB Deals, whereas the second global leader Living Social, which acquired French Dealissime in June, is lagging far behind Groupon in France.

((Comments on this story may be sent to info@m2.com))

Author: Hot Word | Posted in Uncategorized 
129 Comments
A on February 14, 2011 at 7:35 pm

How interesting is this! :) )

Jack Cervantes on February 14, 2011 at 8:08 pm

Sounds like it’s related to Alchemy. Imagine the secrets it holds within it’s pages.

Thomas on February 14, 2011 at 8:45 pm

I wrote the manuscript. Now you have the answer. OK Ok, I didn`t write it. There is a theory that DaVinci wrote it.

DJB on February 14, 2011 at 8:49 pm

It’s an alien cookbook titled: “To Serve Man”

TC on February 14, 2011 at 9:39 pm

My favorite theory is XKCD’s… it’s a fantasy RPG gaming manual. ;)

Dave on February 14, 2011 at 10:03 pm

Given that Voynich discovered the manuscript in 1912 and radiocarbon dating concluded that the book was probably composed between 1404 and 1438 it would be rather difficult for Voynich to be the author… unless he a fair bit of spare time and 240 blank pieces of very old vellum lying around.

aktifistri on February 14, 2011 at 10:09 pm

Never heard anything about this Voynich Manuscript, but the mystery is always interesting to follow! ;) To me the idea of Idioglossia is another interesting stuff to learn more since sometimes me and my husband try to create our own ‘language’ just for fun..

Anyway, if the technology found the manuscript was composed between 1404-1438 and Mr. Voynich reveal the manuscripts in 1912, wouldn’t it be funny since the time he reveal the script and the composing time assumed are making about 400 years gap? Who lives that long? Unless the idea of Yoda-Starwars is really happening to human on this planet :)

Anyway, wish there’ll be some other scientists and historian would appear with their enlightening knowledge to complete this valuable posting! :)

aktifistri on February 14, 2011 at 10:11 pm

Never heard anything about this Voynich Manuscript, but the mystery is always interesting to follow! ;) To me the idea of Idioglossia is another interesting stuff to learn more since my husband and I are sometimes create our own ‘language’ just for fun..

Anyway, if the technology found the manuscript was composed between 1404-1438 and Mr. Voynich reveal the manuscripts in 1912, wouldn’t it be funny since the time he reveal the script and the composing time assumed are making about 400 years gap? Who lives that long? Unless the idea of Yoda-Starwars is really happening to human on this planet :)

Anyway, wish there’ll be some other scientists and historian would appear with their enlightening knowledge to complete this valuable posting! :)

Gavin Spooky on February 14, 2011 at 10:40 pm

Sounds to me like this manuscript is a book of shadows.

Carl on February 14, 2011 at 10:45 pm

I’m not sure I understand… They have the cipher, the “key” to decoding the mysterious text in the manuscript. So why no translation?

only4cody on youtube on February 14, 2011 at 11:20 pm

This is kinda cool-ish. Is that even a word? idk. I hope this gets figured out, it could unlock a whole new world in history and a cool thing to do. It seems very interesting!

piemarox on youtube on February 14, 2011 at 11:21 pm

check out piemarox on youtube while you are waiting for scientists to figure this out!

mwd on February 14, 2011 at 11:30 pm

It is a Players Handbook to a long forgotten role playing game.
obscure images and indecipherable text. Once we find the core book to the system, all will be revealed :D

SJM on February 15, 2011 at 12:16 am

If scientists have successfully radiocarbon dated the manuscript, why do some still stick to the theory that Voynich himself wrote it? Conspiracies just love company.

In any regard, it’s a fascinating relic.

LISA SHEARS on February 15, 2011 at 1:51 am

PRETTY COOL, DEF, PEAKS THE CURIOUSITY, AND DEF GETS YOU WONDERING WTF IT MEANS, SIGNIFIES, IS IT CRYPTIC, YET WRITTEN IN A FASHION THAT PERHAPS IS INTERPRETABLE? WEIRD…

mik on February 15, 2011 at 2:17 am

Oh my gosh! I so want to see this book! The puzzle of it must tie a cryptographers brain in knots. What a fabulous piece of history!

Mistress of Darkness on February 15, 2011 at 2:25 am

Well, it could be one of those mysterious things discovered. And if it is true, then I could also say that people from ancient times are really intelligent. Unlike people nowadays who rely much on computers.

B on February 15, 2011 at 2:44 am

cool, i would like to know what’s inside the manuscript

Joanne on February 15, 2011 at 2:59 am

This is really interesting. I never new this exsisted

john rhea on February 15, 2011 at 3:35 am

A Fried Bologna sandwich please. And a grape soda.

Clark on February 15, 2011 at 4:09 am

Interesting. I wonder what all the ignorant critics will say about this post from the dictionary people.
I’m assuming they’ve applied code breaking software to the piece right? That’s one thing that would be nice to know. Still, a good read. (The article not the Voynich.)

Arnolda on February 15, 2011 at 4:20 am

Possibly if you accurately copied the text and put the entirety on line I am sure someone would recognize the originality if nothing else! And perhaps even decode the writing. Even put it on line as a contest or whatever, in a more of a public fashion and would draw more recognition.
And solve the riddle!!

David E. on February 15, 2011 at 4:40 am

Where can I find this? I want to try my hand.

John Sparrow on February 15, 2011 at 6:14 am

As a lover of language, I enjoy being enlightened by something like this that I have never heard of. But how about an alien race? It might be possible, but I suspect that it will be something akin to what the writer of this article has postulated or hypothesized. Savvy?

Ole TBoy on February 15, 2011 at 6:39 am

In the late 90’s Jodie Foster starred in a film called NELL. Her character, raised in the backwoods of North Carolina by an autistic mother, has her own language (idioglossia) and Liam Neeson and Natasha Richardson are speech scientists who spend the time of the film trying to crack her language and bring Nell into full contact with contemporary society. Take a look at Wikipedia for more detailed info.

Anonymous on February 15, 2011 at 6:47 am

FIRST!

Kidding, kidding…:)

Kim on February 15, 2011 at 6:50 am

How could Voynich have written it? Is he 600 yrs old? Or have the researchers not be able to verify the age of ink, only the vellum… in that case Voynich writing it would be feasible. I guess the theorists are suggesting he found blank vellum (was it bound?) and wrote this crazy language on it for recognition and acclaim?

Vejace Alexei on February 15, 2011 at 6:53 am

Wicked! Wish I would’ve discovered it.

Yoga-Sothoth on February 15, 2011 at 6:56 am

It is patently impossible that Voynich is the author. He would have to have planned to stymie Carbon-14 dating techniques which didn’t exist until some 30 years after he discovered the manuscript. I would suspect the cipher was an early means to retain proprietary knowledge by a small group. If deciphered, it will likely not so much lead us to uncharted medical territory as reflect medical wisdom that might have been advanced for the early 1400’s but not particularly useful in light of current medical advancement and will stand as an interesting relic of its day.

samuel williams on February 15, 2011 at 6:58 am

i dont care

Paramita on February 15, 2011 at 7:00 am

It was probably scrawled by a Doctor. lol

Ian Mallett on February 15, 2011 at 7:01 am

Someone simply wanted to mess with future researchers? I’ve definitely left pieces of paper that are deliberately obtuse just to annoy anyone reading them later. Maybe if you had a lot of time in the late middle ages, and were bored one Saturday . . .

DIVVIE on February 15, 2011 at 7:06 am

WOW!! Not only am I the second to contribute to this interesting and informative blog, but I find it amazing that I had never heard of this fascinating work. Thank you dictionary.com for continuing to educate me

mark V on February 15, 2011 at 7:12 am

Know what i think it is? A Game.

what will future civilizations think when they find our Dungeons and Dragons Monster manuals?
How did they survive as long as they did with so many ancient horrors?
Whys everything measured in “D”s?
Why can’t WE shoot fireballs out of our eyes!?

gen on February 15, 2011 at 7:15 am

How can it be Voynich who discovered it, if he didn’t find it until 1912, and, according to this, this manuscript was written between 1404 and 1438? Otherwise, it is quite an interesting read. I had not heard about this manuscript before, but hopefully it will be deciphered at one point and it will be of value to the world of medicine, as this article suggests. :)

Wrasfish on February 15, 2011 at 7:26 am

Years ago, I read about a new coffee-table book that was for sale at Christmastime. I understand it had intriguing pictures, and what looked like a text, but it was total nonsense.

Still, in 1404, vellum was too expensive to have been used for a deliberate hoax.

Trisha on February 15, 2011 at 7:29 am

I reminds me of the runes left behind in Minnesota by the vikings who visited there in the 1200s. Some of them are encrypted too.

dkde on February 15, 2011 at 7:58 am

There is no possible way he could have written the book in the 1400s and then later “discovered” it in 1912

Ezekiel Rage on February 15, 2011 at 7:58 am

Personally, I’d go for the pharmacopoeia theory; today we have just as many undecipherable “manuscripts” with hidden messages on them of some apparent pharmacological value… the only difference is that nowadays we call them PRESCRIPTIONS.

Anonymous on February 15, 2011 at 7:59 am

Aliens!! It’s ALIENS!!!! :O

Hugh Jorgan on February 15, 2011 at 8:42 am

It is my understanding that Nostradamus predicted that when “Voynick is deciphered” a great flood will occur “in the land of many people”.

Linc86 on February 15, 2011 at 9:03 am

Its the Elder Scrolls VI !

Toby P on February 15, 2011 at 9:13 am

If you look at the words, regardless of whether you recognise the gliffs or not, you can see that they are anagrams of old Italian, and the pictures relate to these words. In that way, it is simple to see that the Voynich manuscript is a form of reference book of the various objects that the artist found around them. The style and the genius involved points to a young Leonardo Da Vinci, as does the newly suggested time of creation that has just been atributed to it.

AmateurCommenter-924 on February 15, 2011 at 9:55 am

It’s alchemy. Definitely alchemy.

chriatina on February 15, 2011 at 9:56 am

hey this is a good story bout this book everyone should read about this book

chriatina on February 15, 2011 at 9:59 am

this book come out so people can read it i would like two read this book really soon it really sound like a really good book two read

Mimi on February 15, 2011 at 10:21 am

Here’s some great insight — http://www.edithsherwood.com/voynich_decoded/

Christina M. on February 15, 2011 at 10:31 am

The writing is around 1400 – 1440, so it probably wasn’t Da Vinci who wrote it; he was born in 1452. It was around the time of the Renaissance, so perhaps it was another potential alchemist who wrote the manuscript under the cover of a doctor’s manual.

JJ Rousseau on February 15, 2011 at 10:33 am

Cinema, oui?

AmateurCommenter-924 on February 15, 2011 at 10:35 am

It’s alchemy, watch: Herbal, to find the right herbs for instantly healing wounds; Astronomical, to find the coordinates for the nearest meteor landing so you can acquire rare substances*; Biological, to learn how to create life; Cosmological, to connect science with what we consider “magic”; Pharmaceutical, to suggest the right medication for an ill person; and Recipes, to learn how to combine herbs for maximum effect. All the systems here are used in the ancient study of alchemy.

*What I meant for this was, back in their time, there were no science labs. So, they might have been able to acquire substances that are scarce by collecting meteor fragments.

I know, it sounds dumb. But, I am just 13-years-old. So, please don’t be harsh. And, besides, it’s only theories. And that’s all we have. For now.

Small Potatoes on February 15, 2011 at 10:54 am

It IS possible Voynich wrote it (even though I don’t think he did). The vellum was carbon-dated not the ink. It is possible that he discovered a blank piece of vellum and wrote on it. Just had to play the devil’s advocate.

Xray on February 15, 2011 at 11:19 am

I like the Alchemy idea, but I think the Freemason’s might have something behind this too. I’m feeling a conspiracy being hatched here.

Ooga Booga on February 15, 2011 at 11:58 am

All I can say is that it looks like very beautiful, eloquent penmanship. If only those pages could talk.

Scarlett on February 15, 2011 at 12:13 pm

PS – the ink dates to the early renaissance.

hatman on February 15, 2011 at 12:19 pm

this book looks very interesting i wonder what it says

Code-a-phile on February 15, 2011 at 12:28 pm

I can feel a Dan Brown novel in the making! Move over, DaVinci Code.

Me on February 15, 2011 at 12:47 pm

Maybe the words are a cover up. Maybe there’s something else hidden and the words aren’t important.

Jvitchka on February 15, 2011 at 12:48 pm

Maybe the “words” aren’t important. Maybe there’s something else on the pages…hidden.

Jameson Madere on February 15, 2011 at 1:28 pm

I haven’t ever actually seen the writing, so I can’t give a very sensible theory, but, based on the little that I know about how people typically decipher codes, I think that it’s very possible for it to be its own language. Imagine an alien (someone from another region, be it on the planet or not) coming to an English-speaking country. It’s almost impossible for us to have the same language as them, so we have no way of communicating through manuscript. If someone devizes his or her own language without basing it off of any other language, then they have a virtually undecipherable cipher.

The LitSoc on February 15, 2011 at 1:40 pm

maybe it’s just a bunch of doodles? :P

Random XD on February 15, 2011 at 1:48 pm

You know that manuscript should be made public so that people can try and decipher it 4 themself and maybe the meaning of it will come out

Jan on February 15, 2011 at 2:33 pm

interesting! :)

Toby P on February 15, 2011 at 2:36 pm

Take a look at what Mimi pointed to – http://www.edithsherwood.com/voynich_decoded/

@ Christina M – the variation in the carbon dating given has a 40-year span. That means that they came up with an estimate and gave it 20 years either side to produce that span. Carbon dating is not a completely exact science as C-14 carbon never ages in precisely the same way. If Da Vinci was born in 1452, and wrote this at the age of 8 (and judging by his later work I believe a person of his acumen would be able to come up with something this detailed at that age and even devise a deceptive cypher), then it only takes a slight inaccuracy in the carbon dating to allow for this possibility. Even the handwriting looks like it could be Da Vinci.

Ryan on February 15, 2011 at 2:57 pm

It’s probably at the same complexity level as the enigma code, the thing it, with the enigma code, we had a machine to decipher it for us.

wordjunkie on February 15, 2011 at 3:20 pm

Maybe it is what Italian penmanship used to look like, before the times of digitalization and rushed shorthand.

l on February 15, 2011 at 4:41 pm

so this rare book sounds really interesting to me:) and imagine how much work it takes to find out these types of mysteries.this is cool:) but what secrects does this book contains :0.i hope this mystery will be solved !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(there are 66 of these ! things for your calculations,don’t believe me?count them for yourself.that’s why they call me fun

qwewer on February 15, 2011 at 5:02 pm

CACTUS

LLOOPP on February 15, 2011 at 5:24 pm

stay in the loooooooooooooooooooop:)

Alexaya on February 15, 2011 at 5:36 pm

wow…… this is amazing if i got my hands on it i could probaly read it……LOLZ

grant on February 15, 2011 at 5:48 pm

its a frod! whoever found it is a total liar something like this never comes up.
grant jacobson= facebook name

AnastasiaBeaverhausen on February 15, 2011 at 6:25 pm

I honestly think it doesn’t matter. While language may be the foundation of all being, so to speak, some things are better left “unsaid” … if you will. It could be possible that there is nothing to read into (excuse the puns) and that we should just appreciate it for what it is: a sliver of history. As they say, “ignorance is bliss”, and maybe we self-righteous, conceited humans don’t need to know everything (:

Polite on February 15, 2011 at 6:36 pm

it’s the recipie for coke. :P

A.J. on February 15, 2011 at 6:38 pm

@Grant Jacobson

“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

corey on February 15, 2011 at 7:57 pm

it would be impossible for DiVinci to write it it was made from way befor his time even if he did it would have to be when he was a kid because he was working on so many other peces and that isent possible because the die was a very expencive they estemated that it was worth over 200 dollers back in there time just in materiles.
an alean wrote it i am serous

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:00 pm

it would be impossible for DiVinci to write it it was made from way befor his time even if he did it would have to be when he was a kid because he was working on so many other peces and that isent possible because the die was a very expencive they estemated that it was worth over 200 dollers back in there time just in materiles. it would of taken 2 years and there was not one mastake
an alean wrote it i am serous

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:01 pm

also just to let you adalts know i am 11 and i am in 6th grade

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:01 pm

notice my spelling mastakes

rishab on February 15, 2011 at 11:15 pm

cool……….i’d like to see it..

Daniel on February 16, 2011 at 1:04 am

Some one should try typing it in google translator that should tell them the latin and other languages then they can guess the last couple of bits :P

McV on February 16, 2011 at 5:07 am

During the early 1400s, when the manuscript was written, it was fairly common to see con-artists hawking cure-alls and recipes for making gold to ignorant wealthy Europeans. There is an old cipher method where you have a sheet of paper with strategically placed holes in it. And when those holes are laid on top of the writing, you read the letters in those holes. That same sheet of paper with holes can be used to generate a false text relatively quickly. The scammer writes all of his glyphs on a sheet and moves the holy paper over the glyph sheet. Whichever symbols are revealed, he copies into the book. This theory is supported by the fact that the book has not a single scratched-out line or mistake (most texts written then had plenty of scribbled-out parts, additions, etc., as parchment was very expensive and writing drafts was not common practice). In addition, carbon-dating samples taken from the beginning and end of the book were found to be almost exactly the same age, which may show that the book was written in a very short period of time (too short for a person to realistically be able to write over 200 pages with full illustrations, unless they used the cypher method). When one take a look at the rather clumsily-drawn illustrations, it is easier to see the possibility that somebody threw this book together rather quickly and after a showy demonstration of his healing powers, sold it to unwitting royalty for a large sum of money.
I find it more likely that a person would devise a way to con the rich and make money, when the alternative is that a person spent years, perhaps his/her whole lifetime collecting samples, testing the properties of plants and herbs and describing and classifying them, only to hide it from the by writing one copy of it in an unbreakable code.

Denis Guéret on February 16, 2011 at 6:49 am

although Italians are master at manufacturing fake antiques, this one must be as old as it seems since in 1912 Carbon 14 dating wasn’t known. It would have been an improbable set of circumstances for Mr Voynich to come across a stack of 15th century cured and unused parchment and for him to take the time to reverse-engineer some encyclopedia. More likely a fake would have been made with new velum aged by artificial means to create the illusion.The book is really an enigma since the amount of time, effort and ressources to produce it in the early 15th (as well as in the 20th) would have been prohibitive if it was just for a joke. Further it would have been extremely dangerous since a manuscript like this one would have appeared to be from satanic inspiration. The cypher is very sophisticated and probably rely on false assumptions about the vehicule and the subject.

Marlene S. on February 16, 2011 at 6:50 am

I’m sure Watson, the Jeopardy computer could figure it out.

Aimes on February 16, 2011 at 9:10 am

Wow I wish I could read it.

theunknownotakufan on February 16, 2011 at 9:23 am

Hmm…I actually watched a documentary on the History channel about this 2 or 3 weeks ago. I’m only 14 and this had my attention. I want to know what thaat book is about (I mean I want to know what it says) It seems that no one knows how to decode this book…maybe the author of this book created a language by combinding latin and his own ‘personal’ language. I mean it’s not very hard to do, people at my school have created a language called “NINE” it mixes english, spanish, japanese and random symbols/penstrokes. Of corse, NINE is used for note passing, but thats not the point. If teens can create a language combinding several languages and random penstrokes, maybe someone in the 14-16th century did it too? If this is true, the author must have the fallowing skills: extinse knowladge, being very artistic, patience, a steady hand and must have alot of money. There are some pages that fold out in the book, plus the book has over 200 pages. Paper, which was animal hide back then, was expensive, exspecially if they a fold out was to be done. These cluses may seem small, but it helps alot. We may never find out who the true author is, but maybe one day we can decode it

Luis Legarreta on February 16, 2011 at 9:49 am

I love this piece of trivia. Is the manuscript scanned and visible on the web?

John on February 16, 2011 at 10:13 am

Well, if it was written by Da Vinci way back when has anyone tried to decipher the mirror image of the document? Then that phrase that they’ve decoded as ‘icnivad ordranael’ might make sense. Hey wait, Icnivad Ordranael? Wasn’t that a cousin of Elrond?

sangeet on February 16, 2011 at 10:43 am

I feel form the above given picture that it was written using a enciphering method like KAMA-SUTRA cipher ,used in India during 400AD which take into account all 64arts of a woman while enciphering a message and represent the entire message in symbols, these 64 arts are explained in KAMASUTRA book……

Anonymous on February 16, 2011 at 10:45 am

@I: They’re called “exclamation points”, so you know.

gamer on February 16, 2011 at 11:19 am

http://xkcd.com/593/
This is the solution.

emily on February 16, 2011 at 11:30 am

i see it says 8 am

Nicole on February 16, 2011 at 11:31 am

The book could have been found before Mr. Vonynich turned it in…it could have been found by his great-great grandpa…then passed down from family to family until the Vonynich we are talking about…sold it?…maybe he was in debt and sold it for money?…it could be…the possibilities are endless…

Froggy on February 16, 2011 at 12:31 pm

Hold it in front of a mirror, turn upside down, and begin reading. You’re welcome.

AshleyAwesome on February 16, 2011 at 5:36 pm

It sounds like something that would be very interesting to understand, and it might even unlock some secrets of the past! It’d also be a key to hopefully understanding other mysterious languages. See, history CAN be fun :D

jenny on February 16, 2011 at 6:01 pm

aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii wwwwwwwwwwwoooooooooonnnnnnnnnn the lottory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Beth on February 16, 2011 at 6:06 pm

MAYBE, just maybe…this book was written by a girl…

Her full name was Mary Lettice, but her family called her Letti. She had a fantastic imagination and loved to pretend. Her father was a scribe for the king and supported his family. In the summer of her 14th year, while he was away at the castle, she went to his library, took his feather quill pen and an blank “scribe-book”. Missing her papa, she began to write…

TwiliYoshiComet on February 16, 2011 at 6:31 pm

I have seen this book on my father’s laptop. It’s very interesting yet confusing. Besides, what’s with the numbers in the top right corner? At first I thought they were the page numbers, but then I thought it was a guide. The plants? I thought the numbers told you the amount of plants or items you need for . . . I dunno. Anyhow, do you think that there is something in the blank spaces of the paper? I do.

By the way, theunkownutakofan I completely agree. Perhaps it is someone’s own ‘personal’ language. You know, people get bored so they make up stuff and get the whole world involved with it. For example, aliens that came to earth or som’n. Please no harshness! Believe it or not, I am a deep believer in outer space. So, anyway, it could be a guy in the 20th centery who threw us humans off track with the ‘unknown language’ whom is probobly laughing at us. Or, do you think maybe a king wrote it or something? You know, to another kingdom while the place was at war? It is possible.
. . . . . . . Ah. Me and my 11 year old imagination.

Oh! And I have three things in mind of what this could be.
1. It’s an alien
2. It’s ‘personal’ language
3. The guy was sycho

However, do you think the writing is Hebrew?

KevG on February 16, 2011 at 6:49 pm

Anybody wonder about the De Ricci Census Vol. II 1846-7 on the inside cover, maybe Vol. I is still in Rome somewhere, probably in the Vatican.

Just wondering….

the weird banana on February 16, 2011 at 9:42 pm

this is exciting! But, come on! Can’t at least SOMEONE decode it? No offense, but humans are pretty lame actually!

the ugly watermelon on February 16, 2011 at 9:47 pm

same thing as the weird banana!:)

the weird banana on February 16, 2011 at 9:49 pm

i hope the other weird banana doesn’t copy me now!(laugh)

the ugly watermelon on February 16, 2011 at 9:51 pm

same thing as the weird banana!

holly on February 16, 2011 at 10:04 pm

really interesting! thank you dictionary com :)
~holly

wow!!!!!!!!! on February 17, 2011 at 12:29 am

wow interesting and here is sth. hard to decode

vby590 89n 8mub90./v9u4tvn489bn4 t9-4m59 509,y 590y m50=yk,n

A:vby590 89n 8mub90./v9u4tvn489bn4 t9-4m59 509,y 590y m50=yk,n

and froggy are u sure your answer works

Curly on February 17, 2011 at 10:06 am

@TwiliYoshiComet:

No, I don’t think so. I know that it’s not so. Hebrew is not exactly an obscure language. If it was Hebrew, it would have been recognized.

JESSICA on February 17, 2011 at 1:35 pm

to I on February 15, 2011 at 4:41 pm

there are actually 65 exclamation points (!’s)

NOT 66!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

ka.trina on February 18, 2011 at 4:25 pm

Doesn’t it look familiar to anybody? Anyone read Lord of the Rings? Anyone actually look at the Elvish language that Tolkien created? If a man in the 20th century can create his own language than a man in the 15th century can.

Anonymous on February 19, 2011 at 1:31 pm

@DJB LOL Are you talking about Narnia?

Susan Jordan on February 24, 2011 at 12:02 pm

How about a pre-Indo-European language? The European languages today all go back to Indo-European roots, from the Bronze Age invasions or migrations by waves of barbarians coming into India and Europe from the Asian steppes and wrecking the ancient Neolithic civilizations — some of whose primeval languages came to be known as Etruscan, pre-Minoan Cretan etc. The only remaining Euro language related to Neolithic peoples (builders of stone circles like Stonehenge) is Basque. Just a thought… Most people don’t even know about the lost Old European Neolithic civilization (read Gimbutas).

Greg Moore on February 25, 2011 at 12:12 pm

Something tells me it had to do with warfare. During that era there were kingdoms rising and falling almost daily across Europe. Too long for a battle plan, it might have been a history of war

Greg Moore on February 25, 2011 at 12:54 pm

Someone so involved with plants could have stumbled upon a hallucinogen and decided to write whatever came to mind. Any pictures of mushrooms?

Weretheysmarterthanus? on February 27, 2011 at 7:05 am

Is there a key to the manuscript? Or is that why scientists (or whatever you’re calling them) are having such a hard time decrypting the manuscript? If there isn’t a key to the language/code, could it be in the pictures? Because you have to admit, most people wouldn’t put in pictures with a manuscript of any kinds-it would just be words, words, and more words. Perhaps the pictures were put there to just spike everyone’s attention, like the person who wrote the manuscript knew (just KNEW) that we would find it and become utterly fascinated.
So, I say we should look towards the pictures, not the words. Look for a key in the pictures. I have no idea what you would look for in the pictures. Perhaps letter-like strokes in the images? I have no idea.

As for my theory? It probably shares some of the secrets from the 1400’s. You KNOW there has to be stuff that happened in the 1400’s that we don’t know about, and that could tell us some of the mysteries that happened. There could be some observations of the stars, bible, even plants(!) that we haven’t caught up on, but they did. I think that’d be pretty cool…just so long as they share exactly what the manuscript says…and posts it online perhaps as well. ;D

#1 Skillet Fan on March 7, 2011 at 5:52 pm

I still think DaVinci wrote it. I heard that he wrote backwards because he was left handed, so mabe looking at it in a mirror would help decode it? Furthermore carbon dating isn’t really all that accurate in the first place, so it could be a later date than the one that carbon dating calls for…just a thought
~Chick Drummer~

bumpyRd on June 24, 2011 at 12:59 pm

BTW you should not really comment w/o rtfa nor dismiss teams of scientists very lightly.

7%Solution on October 21, 2011 at 1:54 pm

Publish sections of it on the web and see if anyone can break the code. If they can’t read it, what’s the harm? Maybe enough minds could do what a few minds could not.
If it was encrypted and involved healing, it was to protect the author and any book holders from charges of witchcraft. If healers could heal without needing “god’s intervention” aka The Church of Rome, then they were :witches” and burned at the stake, tortured, ot both. By encrypting the text, the book could be read by a select few but would be jibberish to any Catholic authorities… or modern scientists. Or it’s one heck of a great hoax! If a hoax, WHY? What else is in the book? If script is found beneath the hoax text, it could be even more important.

Celeste on October 21, 2011 at 11:53 pm

There’s a good program on the manuscript on PBS called The Voynich Mystery. There’s a YouTube link.

http://www.ovguide.com/tv_episode/the-voynich-mystery-season-1-episode-1-episode-1-1941461

c on October 22, 2011 at 3:35 am

aliens, because humans are aliens. /thread

Jay on October 22, 2011 at 8:00 am

Mistress of Darkness!!??!? Grow up!!

JavierV on October 23, 2011 at 4:23 pm

Me parece que lo importante no es saber quien lo haya escrito sino saber de qué trata el texto…
Tampoco tiene sentido que alguien lo haya escrito “para que lo encontraran después y todo el mundo se pregunte de qué trata”, como hago yo ahora que no me molesto en escribir en una lengua extranjera, si no me comprenden ahí tienen el traductor de Google.

N7xMartinx666 on October 26, 2011 at 1:42 pm

imagine how many mysteries does the human race has kept for aeons!! and how cool it would be to decipher all those secrets, divine or otherwise!!!

Bob The Builder #1 on October 26, 2011 at 5:15 pm

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOwwwwwwwww!!!!! So cool, it’s just like me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S. ( pears are stalkers and cell phones are trying to take over the world!)

Aaron DeCamp on October 26, 2011 at 6:22 pm

Chuck Norris wrote it, and he is the only one who could ever decode it. He made it to get people crazy, which he succeeded in his attempt. Peace.

Frustated @ Ignorance on October 26, 2011 at 7:25 pm

@ corey11

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:00 pm
it would be impossible for DiVinci to write it it was made from way befor his time even if he did it would have to be when he was a kid because he was working on so many other peces and that isent possible because the die was a very expencive they estemated that it was worth over 200 dollers back in there time just in materiles. it would of taken 2 years and there was not one mastake an alean wrote it i am serous

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:01 pm
also just to let you adalts know i am 11 and i am in 6th grade

corey11 on February 15, 2011 at 8:01 pm
notice my spelling mastakes
———————————————-
First off, if you’re in the 6th grade, you must have wealthy parents to bribe your teachers, as your grammar, punctuation, and capitalization stinks. Also, if you KNOW you are making spelling mistakes, then get a tad bit more of an education, and FIX THEM.

Anyways, on to the story…

@ Toby P on February 15, 2011 at 2:36 pm

This is probably the only comment worth reading. Thank you Toby for not wasting my time. All of science’s time dating methods are flawed. None of them are exact. Each of them is used for different time frames based on ages past. If they were exact, then it would be exact regardless of the age. So, since there is a variable degree of inaccuracy, it is most certainly possibly, and highly probable, that Da Vinci may have done this piece of work.

Daniel on October 26, 2011 at 11:25 pm

The answer is simple. This is the book on how to understand women.

Jayzee on October 27, 2011 at 4:14 am

What about the encrypted sculpture that is outside the Langley, Virginia CIA headquarters that hasn’t been decoded yet!

King Viz on October 27, 2011 at 7:43 am

There are no unknowns, only things that are not being shared.

Tammy D on October 28, 2011 at 11:40 am

Wasn’t Voynich a rare book dealer? Who’s to say he didn’t get his hands on some old vellum and other materials and just make the book himself, then write the book? Or what if he was able to acquire a really old vellum book that had never been written in and he did the drawings and the words?

Tammy D on October 28, 2011 at 11:40 am

Did the scientists test the ink, or just the vellum? What about the book’s cover?

Fattyk on October 29, 2011 at 9:53 am

Oh! It looks more complicated. However, how did they manage to know what might be written in the book such as the aforementioned purpose which it serve for ( i.e herb), meanwhile no one can read it. Therefore whoever sugest what might be written in the book will no about the language and how it is written. Not everything in life can be determined by computer or scanner.

Leave a comment
Name
Email
Website

Dictionary.com, LLC. Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.
About Privacy Policy Terms of Use API Careers Advertise with Us Contact Us Help