Why “tergiversate” is our 2011 Word of the Year

There are essentially two ways to pick a “word of the year.” One common approach is to select from words whose common usage reflects some quality of the year past. Expect to see “occupy,” “winning,” etc., on many selections this December. Another way involves actually using the dictionary. Is there a word that captures the character of 2011, regardless of its popularity or ubiquity?

In late October, we asked our Facebook fans which method of selection they preferred. Almost 7 out of the 10 of them said it should be a word that aptly defines the spirit of 2011, even if the choice is obscure. We like to listen to our ardent supporters.

Just as you come to Dictionary.com in order to find the precise word you need, we spelunked through our corpus to find that perfect fit for 2011. And so we chose tergiversate, a rare word that means “to change repeatedly one’s attitude or opinions with respect to a cause, subject, etc.; equivocate.” The stock market, politicians and even public opinion polls have tergiversated all year long. Tergiversate is derived from the Latin word “vertere,” to turn. It shares a root with the words “verse” and “versus.” Can’t figure out how to pronounce it? Check out the audio pronunciation. One could say that events in Tahrir Square continue to tergiversate as sharply now as they did in the spring.

Here are a few examples of how the word has turned up in the press. On August 20th, 2011, in The Times of London, Oliver Kamm said, “The tergiversations of stock markets are often puzzling from the outside. They’re no less puzzling from within.” In September, the Baltimore Sun picked tergiversation as its word of the week. Last year in May of 2010, James Surowecki, a staff writer for the New Yorker, used the word to describe German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s economic choices: “Political risk is hard to manage because so much comes down to the personal choices of policymakers, whether prime ministers or heads of central banks. And those choices aren’t always going to be economically rational—witness Merkel’s recent tergiversations.”

To choose a word like “occupy,” “Arab Spring,” or “austerity” would be an evaluation of events from our narrow vantage. We do not yet know what the impact of these events will be on a historical scale, whether there will be any long-term change as a result of the Occupy movement or whether democracy has finally come to the Middle East.

Another way to honor the year in a single word would be to pick a neologism. This year a few words were coined. The New York Times described the “pinking” of America, or the spread of breast cancer awareness through the emblem the color pink. Football hero Tim Tebow unknowingly started a craze: tebowing. To tebow is to kneel on one knee with your hand on your forehead and pray, while everyone around you is doing something else. Fans saw him do this during a game and mimicked it. The results have been an internet sensation, but you won’t yet find the word in our dictionary. More recently, Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry created the malapropism “forewithal” to describe how countries should respond to the global financial crisis. The word seems to be a combination of fortitude and wherewithal.

To be candid, there was a very close runner-up for the Word of the Year. When we learned that the word “insidious” originally came from the Latin word “insidere” which meant “to sit on, occupy,” we nearly chose this dark term. The word insidious attracted attention when the horror film Insidious came out in April of this year, and the term is constantly in the news: insidious diseases, the insidious super-committee, an insidious assault. The word encapsulates a feeling that seems to pervade 2011: “proceeding in a seemingly harmless way but actually with grave effect.” Ultimately, though, insidious is too negative to represent the mood of change and transformation that has marked this year as well. Take our quiz on the meanings of other Word of the Year runners-up here.

Words of the moment and clever coinages are great fun, but tergiversate continues to resonate across a variety of experiences from the past year. Do you agree? Let us know what you think of our choice and whether we’ve overlooked other candidates.

Author: Hot Word | Posted in Uncategorized 
82 Comments
Becky on November 30, 2011 at 9:20 am

I think that if I ever used that in an essay, my teacher would have to look it up. It would be the first time for a while!

Julian Hook on November 30, 2011 at 9:58 am

Another nice tidbit about this word: somewhere along the way I happened to learn that “tergiversation” is an anagram of “interrogatives,” which at 14 letters makes the longest pair of single-word anagrams I know of.

L. Craig Schoonmaker on November 30, 2011 at 10:40 am

I cannot agree with the choice of word, which is never heard (you could find only a handful of examples from print in more than a year), and the absurd spelling offends me. It contains the word “give”, but the G is pronounced J! We’ve got to fix the spelling of English once and for all so it no longer attacks people with a “system” that is so chaotic that no one knows how to spell or read every word unless they devote their entire life to spelling, and English, an otherwise simple language, is very hard to master. Spelling causes functional illiteracy. Spelling reform (www.fanetik.org) would end it.

Alex on November 30, 2011 at 10:55 am

Julian, I do not believe “interrogatives” (with an -s) is technically a word, unless it existed as a noun whose meaning referred to words possessing a shared quality of pertaining to, or conveying, a question. Nevertheless, I believe it should be. Very creative discovery!

TERGIVERSATE | BLOGCHI@mayopia.com on November 30, 2011 at 11:45 am

[...] ‘Tergiversate’ repeatedly, – Flip, Flop and Fly. — Such is the Essence of this Unreceptive Information Age: — The Truth can be the Lie. — Regurgitate the Talking Points, — Be the Newsworthy Sage. –  “Fore With All” the Malapropisms, — Wit noses outa Joints, — ‘Oppugnancy’ of the Political ‘Internecine’ Classes — No need for the Huricane Asses. — in some ‘Zugzwang’ of alternative schisms. — Never be there ‘Quietus’ to ‘refudiate’ — all the numerous whacky isms. — Hence the only solution is to repeatedly ‘Tergiversate’.  –>>L.T.Rhyme This entry was posted in DEMOCRAZY, DICTCOMHOTWORD, L.T.Rhyme and tagged BALLS BALLS BALLS, Democracy, LT, LTRhyme, the HOT WORD by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]

Courtenay on November 30, 2011 at 11:58 am

I totally agree with this choice for word of the year! Hang on, wait… maybe I don’t… ;)

And L. Craig Schoonmaker, “fanetik” spelling will never solve the difficulties of English for at least one simple reason: English has a number of dialects, with differing pronunciations. What you as (I assume) an American English speaker pronounce “fanetikali” as kan’t, I as an Australian English speaker pronounce as kahn’t – to give just one example (exammple to you, exahmple to me). Both are correct, depending on where one comes from. But whose dialect should be considered more “correct” when it comes to inventing a standardised “fanetik” spelling?

Not to mention the fact that the very reason English has such inconsistent spelling is because it has drawn words from so many other languages. The way a word is spelled usually gives a good clue to where it came from, and what other words it is related to. Take “phonetic” itself. If it’s spelled “fanetik”, how can anyone tell it comes from the same (Greek) root as “phone” (which presumably would have to be “fone”, or maybe “foan”, to get rid of that nasty silent e) – and has no relation whatsoever to “fan”? If “sign” were spelled “sine” or “syn”, there goes its connection to “signal”, “signify”, “significant”, “signature”…

Every language on earth has its quirks and oddities, and English is hardly the worst. French – another language with a long, rich history – is even more absurd when it comes to things not being spelled the way they are pronounced. If you have so little respect for your own linguistic heritage – or if you yourself are so “functionally illiterate” that you can’t cope any longer with a language that dares to have inconsistencies – how about you drop English and every other naturally evolved language, and take up Esperanto?

[...] Dictionary.com crowned the word "tergiversate" as Word of the Year in 2011. [...]

Chea on November 30, 2011 at 1:06 pm

Oooh, thanks L. Craig Schoonmaker , I needed that laugh.

J.J.Rousseau on November 30, 2011 at 1:28 pm

What he said, Oui?

adrian baker on November 30, 2011 at 1:44 pm

the word of the year is OCCUPY.
agree with what they are doing or not, but that IS the word of the year.

y’idiots.

Zombie Spy on November 30, 2011 at 1:49 pm

hey i did a current event for science on this, and in the paper I voted for that word. Sweet!

Rosalind on November 30, 2011 at 1:50 pm

This is a crazy word…….I can’t wait to use it!

sherryyu on November 30, 2011 at 2:49 pm

kool, althought i reccomand sarcastic to be a candidate so it coud be winner in 2012!! :) :D YAY!!!!!!

J. E. Moore on November 30, 2011 at 2:54 pm

Well… if you want a language that you don’t want to have to deal with spelling things oddly, Mr. Schoonmaker, try CHINESE, or any other language that has a system of CHARACTERS instead of words spelled out with a set number of letters.
And thank you, Courtenay, for saying that. That made my day so much better.

Nicolas on November 30, 2011 at 3:05 pm

“Tergiversate” is indeed a great word. It’s a wonder how different it is from Spanish “tergiversar”, which means “to give a forced or erroneous interpretation of words or events.”

drew on November 30, 2011 at 3:10 pm

@L. Craig Schoonmaker

English spelling and usage is organic and democratic. There is no “system” that keeps its conventions entrenched.

A single voice can sway an entire democracy, so why don’t you lead the charge to better “Inglish” by spelling everything the way you think it should be spelled.

Good luck with that.

(Unknown) ;) on November 30, 2011 at 3:18 pm

Interesting….
If I could only say it!!

~Too.Beast.For.You on November 30, 2011 at 3:28 pm

Courtenay …

… that was … totally …

… EEEPPPPIIIIICCC!!!!!!!!! (BTW: WTH is Esperanto?

Dan the Man on November 30, 2011 at 3:51 pm

@ L ShoeMaker:

It is not solely spelling that complicates our language. I have been studying world languages for several years now, and English has the most complex grammar of any language. (A popular misconception is that Chinese is harder; which is in fact untrue. It is harder to read because it has evolved into over 20 spoken languages, but a writing system that uses symbols for each word, rendering the task of learning to read in a Chinese language a difficult feat. It does, however, have a very simple syntax as to what is correct). I digress; Even if we were to change the spelling of English to be like Spanish or Italian (words sound like they are spelled); this would not solve the problem. Just looking at the syntax of a simple sentence in English would show that it is much more complex, than, say, a sentence in Japanese. If you look at the other Romance languages however, you will find that their sentence structure is very much like that of ours; just a few centuries behind. My theory is that the Romance languages will evolve in very similar ways, with English in the lead, as it is now. My point in short: spelling is not the sole thing that complicates our language; but also overly complex (some would say arbitrary) sentence structure.

Dan the Man on November 30, 2011 at 3:51 pm

Sorry:

@ L. Craig Schoonmaker, not L. Shoemaker

Harold Lowen Concannon on November 30, 2011 at 4:37 pm

Well hey, I like it. The word’s strange and fun to say.

Alexandria Lanai on November 30, 2011 at 4:49 pm

This is an amazing word! I love it and it totally suits what 2011 was like for me! A year of changes with a cause as it’s catalyst! :)

someone on November 30, 2011 at 6:32 pm

This is an awesome word to be chosen for word of the year or whatever it is called.

someone on November 30, 2011 at 6:33 pm

This is an awesome word to be chosen for word of the year or whatever it is called. I wonder who searched it up first, and I wonder how many words there are in the whole entire universe!?!

Bill on November 30, 2011 at 7:47 pm

The funniest thing about Craig L. Schoonmaker’s little rant is his own surname. I’m guessing the way he pronounces it varies quite widely from how the Dutch would pronounce it, which includes a sound on the first syllable like they’re clearing some phelgm from the back of a throat.

Antonia on November 30, 2011 at 7:51 pm

I will say that the world of the year should be Organic.

Raymond on November 30, 2011 at 7:58 pm

Before the Tower of Babel fell, they’d built it 43 years in running…

But fact ’twas naught but the largest hill they sculpted, 43 years…

And the 43rd year they baked brick, and bricked it brick by brick…

But, If you think that’s history, What do you say to a complainer…

Somebody who notices the nonsense they were doing– Do you…

Who, pays attention to any who at last repeats yesterdays’, jibe…

The finish of the story is that the wind lifted the brick veneer– off.

If that, doesn’t explain the situation of politics, nothing better will.

The question is, What is the mean and variance of tergiversate?!

Boy, those politicophytes, Who, said it best, “Dum, da da dum–”

(DISCLAIMER: Not a comment on the “We are Farmers,” jingle.)

[...] dictionary.com, the selection process is completely transparent, and you can decide for yourself by reading about it on their blog. However to my mind the runner-up is many orders of magnitude better, combining as it does [...]

Tergiversate | Shooting Parrots on December 1, 2011 at 12:44 am

[...] Hot Word blog has nominated the above as their word of the year, one that sums up the mood of 2011, and I have to [...]

Ammishaddai on December 1, 2011 at 1:18 am

there’s no day i don’t visit dictionary.com

Ammishaddai on December 1, 2011 at 1:21 am

Seriously tergiversate does give an idea of a vegetable of some sort doesn’t it?

L.O. on December 1, 2011 at 3:17 am

I think you make some very good points as to why you chose the word you did as “word of the year”, particularly in paragraph five, above: to choose a labeling word would evaluate more than encasulate the global events and mood of the past year. A moniker with a negative connotation would go to the same; as you said, we don’t know the ultimate impact of the year’s events.

Thank you for a great choice and addition to my personal lexicon!

Now, if I could only figure out how to get the sound working on this dang laptop so I would know how to say it…:-)

Roger Green on December 1, 2011 at 3:20 am

I never heard of the word, but I agree with the choice.

Linda on December 1, 2011 at 4:11 am

You refer in your article to “the insidious super-committee.” I believe that is an incorrect use of the word “insidious.” (perhaps the period should be outside the quotes here, but anyway…)

It’s my understanding that “insidious” refers to an effect but not a person. We can’t have “insidious” people: The tactics of the super-committee caused an insidious erosion of public trust.

Mish on December 1, 2011 at 4:13 am

Touché, Courtenay!

Linda on December 1, 2011 at 4:16 am

Well, I looked it up (peeked), and I guess it’s okay to describe a person as insidious. (Stealthily treacherous or deceitful.) I still don’t like it though.

Dennis on December 1, 2011 at 5:23 am

Hey Courtenay-
I was going to give a well-thought reply to Craig Schoony that detailed a list of reasons that I disagreed with his oversimplified 3rd grade rant. I just want to thank you for saving me the time- You Rock!

RachelAllison on December 1, 2011 at 6:02 am

How interesting…..

Paul on December 1, 2011 at 6:28 am

Never heard of this word before, and I would suggest that if I tried to use it in an actual conversation, all I would be doing would be showing off my obscure vocabulary, which noone would understand… and whatever point I was trying to make would be lost. An awful choice, and a difficult pronunciation to boot. Think about it – the only part of the word that makes any sense to most people is ‘giver’, a popular slang term. You definitely lost it on this one!

J on December 1, 2011 at 6:32 am

Now that is beautiful. Stop your witless complaining and enjoy the beauty of the language. Thank you D.com for giving us the opportunity and pathway to enrich our vocabularies.

jose de claro on December 1, 2011 at 7:07 am

My tea’s gone cold, I’m wondering why
I got out of bed alone
The morning rain clouds up my window
And I can’t see at all
And even if I could it’ d all be grey
But your picture on my wall it reminds me
That it’s not so bad, it’s not so bad

I drank too much last night, got bills to pay
My head just feels in pain
I missed the bus and there’ll be hell today
I’m late for work again and even if I’m there
They’ll all imply that I might not last the day
And then you call me and it’s not so bad
It’s not so bad

[Chorus:]
And I want to thank you for giving me
The best day of my life
Ohh, just to be with you is having
The best day of my life

Push the door, I’m home at last and I’m soaking
Through and through then you handed me a towel
And all I see is you, and even if my house falls
Down now, I wouldn’t have a clue because you’re
Near me

[Chorus:](Repeat 2X)
And I want to thank you for giving me
The best day of my life
Ohh, just to be with you is having
The best day of my life

———————————————

We used to laugh
We used to cry
We used to bow our heads then
Wonder why
But now you’re gone
I guess I’ll carry on
And make the best of what you’ve left to me
Left to me, left to me

I need you
Like the flower needs the rain
You know, I need you
Guess I’ll start it all again
You know, I need you
Like the winter needs the spring
You know I need you
I need you

And every day
I’d laugh the hours away
Just knowing you were thinking of me
Then it came
That I was put to blame
For every story told about me
About me, about me

I need you
Like the flower needs the rain
You know, I need you
Guess I’ll start it all again
You know, I need you
Like the winter needs the spring
You know I need you
I need you, I need you

LukeJavan on December 1, 2011 at 7:17 am

I had a student use it once,and I had heard the term, but had to look
it up to get the flavor he meant in his term paper. Good choice.

David on December 1, 2011 at 7:51 am

Well said @ Courtenay (Kort’ne? Kort’ni? Kortenee? Kortenaa?)

As is evidenced by the fact that, phonetically, I would not spell phonetic with an “a” as it is clearly a long “o” when I say it, (or maybe a schwa?).

SharaLeigh on December 1, 2011 at 7:59 am

Thank you Courtenay for such a well put argument. I fully agree. Dictionary.com is my homepage as I am in love with our language. I enjoy learning new words as well as using them to more fully express myself. In fact, I just wrote “tergiversate” and the latin origin of “insidious” on a small piece of paper that is going up on my refrigerator. Knowlege is good.

Quizzy on December 1, 2011 at 8:02 am

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, !

Ptron on December 1, 2011 at 8:59 am

Here, here, Courtenay!

Darwin Christ Almighty! on December 1, 2011 at 9:22 am

@adrian baker
The word of the year should be EVICT.
By the way, referring to a group as idiots is not the best way to convince them you are correct.

Kelly Donovan on December 1, 2011 at 9:44 am

Thank you, Courtenay, for answering L. Craig Schoonmaker; it saved me the trouble & your answer was far more eloquent than mine!

@ adrian baker: No need for your closing remark. Opinions are fine; insults are not.

Ella on December 1, 2011 at 9:56 am

I just read this word in a book! Awesome choice.

Ptron on December 1, 2011 at 10:05 am

And adrian baker, “y’idiots”? Really? Come on. It’s a frivolous “word of the year” competition. Don’t take it so seriously.

While I’m replying to your comment, you may disagree with “tergiversate” as the word of the year (I’m not sure I agree), but “occupy” has only been a single part of a turbulent year.

If any one word could represent the year on a global scale, I’d be more inclined to propose a word like “uncertainty” or “discord.”

random on December 1, 2011 at 10:42 am

Perfect choice for a highly imperfect year.

Vikhaari on December 1, 2011 at 11:09 am

Tergiversate: “to change repeatedly one’s attitude or opinions with respect to a cause, subject, etc…”
Tergiverstae is uniquely wonderful (and/or vise versa) of a term/word and wisely chosen wisely fellow friends–brothers &sisters, usual greetings in my motherland/birthland, belonging globally of mine.
Tergiversate, this new word of the year must not only be liked, loved and happily to be used also be honoured, respected and cherished.
Tergiverstae, I must learn you, and know you… & salute you for your deserved win.
Tergiverstae, thank you & now, you & I let’s roll forward to change… again, & again.

Carol on December 1, 2011 at 11:13 am

Reading through the comments, I noticed the one from Nicolas. I was baffled by the English meaning since in Spanish it basically means, “to twist one’s words” or to twist events. In Spanish it is a fairly common word, found often in newspapers, books and in other publications.

Cyberquill on December 1, 2011 at 12:22 pm

Tergiversate? What’s wrong with merkin?

KT on December 1, 2011 at 2:43 pm

oh there they are :3

sherryyu on December 1, 2011 at 2:44 pm

i ment reccomend

Nshera on December 1, 2011 at 4:03 pm

That is interesting. If any of you here is a Christian, do not celebrate Christmas. You can celebrate it any other day, but Christmas. I will continue in my next comments.

M-bear on December 1, 2011 at 6:28 pm

I CANT EVEN SAY IT!!!! I SRLY THINK THE WRD OF THE YEAR SHOULD BE DRAMA-BOMB!!!!! IT SUMS UP 6th GRADE AND POLITICS

sam on December 1, 2011 at 7:12 pm

i love this the app is on my phone and i enjoy it.

Karen F on December 1, 2011 at 7:56 pm

Thank you for bringing a new “never before heard” english word for my attention with Tergiversate. I would propose “tumultuous” to encompass the experiences of 2011, the experience of the Occupy movement, the politics, the economy, the real estate, the budget, healthcare reform, etc. But then again, we would have to pick this word year after year… ha ha I like Tergiversate and I will try to encorporate it into my vocabulary. Thank you Dictionary.Com for expanding my word world!

JenCraze on December 1, 2011 at 9:39 pm

While I appreciate adding this new word to my vocal, I appreciate the process of transparency, thoughtfulness and explanation of how tergeriservate was declared the winning word. Well done, it will occupy my mind for quite some time. :)

Minkoya on December 1, 2011 at 10:16 pm

Thanks for bringing a word ” that I never heard before ”
Have a good day! :D

Denis on December 2, 2011 at 3:24 am

in french, tergiverser, means to postpone a decision, to avoid a clear call.

Socrates on December 2, 2011 at 10:00 am

For etymologists at heart, “tergiversation” itself is a tergiversation. Because its meaning has been constantly changing from its latin origin: tergiversare = to turn one’s back.
Turning your back on something seems rather different from equivocating, vacillating or repeatedly changing your mind on something. As DENIS points out (v.s.), in french “tergiverser” means to postpone a decision, in spanish “tergiversar” means to distort, to twist. Tergiversation, what a tergiversant word!
A Hot Word hat trick, congratulations to a most enjoyable exposé!

DEMACIA!!!!! on December 2, 2011 at 3:31 pm

Nice article, one thing I don’t like about “Word of the Year” is that there are so many of them!!! Dictionary.com has one, Merriam-Webster has one, the American Something-or-Other Society has one, etc.

@L. Craig Schoonmaker
How does the correct spelling of a word OFFEND you??? The word ‘tergiversate’ is in no way offensive. Anyway, at least Mark Twain agrees with you about simplifying spelling. :P

@jose de claro
What’s with the song??

@Nshera
No offense or anything, but I’m really tired of people talking about religion in every other Dictionary article. In the one about Catholic Mass, people were posting things like “So-and-so is a fake worshipper, So-and-so is bashing Catholicism, etc.” Seriously? Please post your opinion about Christmas in some blog that is actually ABOUT religion…

[...] Hot on the heels of the Oxford Dictionary announcement that ‘Squeezed Middle’ was the word of the year, the dictionary.com website has made its own announcement. [...]

[...] This is my new favourite blog post and this is why: [...]

Samuel on December 3, 2011 at 9:53 pm

Fascinating word… but of the year? I agree with Paul; it’s a show off word. The Baltimore Sun did good making it the word of the week. The decision kind of reminds me of the one made my the Norwegian Nobel Committee when they awarded Obama the Noble Peace Prize. It’s just too much.

Cameron on December 4, 2011 at 6:54 pm

I have to disagree with the need to repair English by making phonetic spelling that was suggested in an early post.

English’s beauty is that it word parts carry meaning, not sound. The meaning can be derived from the word itself.

Hopefully, vocabulary will catch on as a subject to teach thoroughly in school. research is pointing to the vocabulary of a 3 year old as the best indicator of student success. Yep, it’s that soon…age 3.

Talk to your kids…a lot!

[...] will be especially interested in Dictionary.com’s Word of the Year for 2011: tergiversate (tur-ji-ver-seyt), a verb meaning “to change repeatedly one’s [...]

Creatures on December 5, 2011 at 8:05 am

[...] Suggestions – Living Social Washington DCIsrael’s Mona Lisa Weapon : IsraellycoolWhy “tergiversate” is our 2011 Word of the Year .spacer { background-image:url('http://magicthegathering.in/blog/wp-content/plugins/WP Traffic [...]

A pea in the pod on December 5, 2011 at 5:55 pm

A new word to make our poetic minds roll…

E on December 8, 2011 at 3:31 pm

@Courtenay, I totally agree with you. Every language has its oddities, and they’re important. Because if everything was spelled fanetikaly, then all of the etymology of the word would be lost. Plus, then, there would be no point in spelling bees!

M-bear on December 9, 2011 at 6:36 am

HEY! its me again this wrd haz been stuck in my head 4 ever!!!! and and guess what….. they used this wrd on “The big bang therory!”

Marceline on December 9, 2011 at 6:40 am

….heyy.. i been foolin’ around in the fire kingdom whats with this stupin wrd ………………………….it should be nightosphere…………………..hahahaha
~mar-mar

Nshera on December 13, 2011 at 3:53 pm

Occupy is DISGUSTING! :( !

middle c on December 15, 2011 at 8:46 am

I still say zugzwang was a better choice

Word of the Year 2011: Choose your favourite on December 19, 2011 at 4:57 am

[...] Dictionary.com they went for “tergiversate” – perhaps to force people to use dictionary.com to [...]

Words, words, words « Mighty Red Pen on December 30, 2011 at 4:20 pm

[...] named tergiversate  (which I think I’ve finally figured out how to spell) as its WOTY for for reasons that I’m sure seem well thought out to them. To me, it seemed like the year obviously belonged to occupy, both for its ubiquity and its [...]

Words I Never Said on January 17, 2012 at 10:48 am

Wow… It’s sad that dictionary.com made a whole forum to pretend that they want the people to select the word of the year, but when the people chose a word (OCCUPY), which did not appeal to the public image of certain “occupiers”, who have obvious influence in the selection of dic.com word of the year, it was spun it into a word that defeats the passion, unity, and vigor of the people who were unified by the beautiful changes/ progress that had taken place in 2011… Instead, selecting a word that no one had suggested. A word that will go down in history telling people that 2011 was about indecision or apathy, as opposed to unity, revolutionary change, and reform. And the reasoning is that it is not clear whether or not there will be democracy in the middle east?! How about reading the news?!!! How about Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and the others in pursuit?! How about the reform/ attention to global economies resulting from the Occupy Movements across the US & world? HIDDEN AGENDA is written all over this… I lost respect for you dictionary.com…

Duncan on February 18, 2012 at 2:55 pm

@Demacia – the second song is “I Need You” by America. I don’t know what the first song is. However, I have no idea why @jose de claro put them on this thread or forum.

How about ‘enubilous’ (meaning cloudless) for a future word of the year?

tv amr on February 21, 2012 at 9:21 pm

Exactly what is the best Canon Powershot electronic (duh) camera? I don’t mind spending time for mostly casual pictures (christmas, birthdays, family reunions that almost stuff). And occasionally several cool artistic photos. Im told than the usual 6-7 mm lens would be the best Rather than whereby, what else is excellent???

Leave a comment
Name
Email
Website

Dictionary.com, LLC. Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.
About Privacy Policy Terms of Use API Careers Advertise with Us Contact Us Help